When I was a kid, there were two card games that corresponded to politics. One civilized and one rowdy. The civilized one was War. The rowdy one was Spit. We’ve been playing Spit since the 2000 election. It’s not about gentlemen and ladies playing seriously across a table. It’s about being faster, more ruthless, more physical, and yes, more violent with your cards than your opponent. War doesn’t have an equivalent of the race card. Spit has nothing but. The so-called play is just short of fisticuffs. Which it sometimes leads to.
But there was a whole other game nobody really played. 52 Pickup. It wasn’t a game at all. It was a damnation of games. It consisted of simply throwing the whole deck up in the air and challenging anyone to make sense of the result.
Where we are with the NSA revelations. Left and right no longer entirely matter, and they are not predictive. Time to figure out where you really stand. This is a juggling of first principles, and I’m thinking it’s a litmus test it’s possible to fail utterly.
The contradictions and reversals are so huge that I feared I couldn’t find a way to illustrate them. But then I saw Fox News Channel’s show The Five this evening. Enough to start the discussion.
Bob Beckel. The crusty reliable lefty. Outraged. To the max. He referenced the Patriot Act, but he didn’t content himself with blaming Bush. He blamed Obama more for extending the surveillance to all Americans.
Dana Perino. She was inclined to trust the NSA. Huh? She wondered why the whistleblower ran away to Hong Kong and asked why he didn’t come to Washington, DC, to make his revelations. Really? He wouldn’t have been swarmed by 8000 federal agents and disappeared from view? Really?
Greg Gutfeld. Total sellout. Ultimate libertarian announces he has an End Of the World clause that justifies the end of liberty if it prevents a nuclear terrorist attack. He seemed, I’m sorry to say, in a state of near panic.
Kimberly Guilfoyle. Thought she was raising the central issue when she said, “if we’re talking the ends justifying the means…” But I forgot that she’s a former federal prosecutor. The only ends vs. means issue she saw was the whistleblower. He’s a boastful would-be hero who has to be prosecuted. In her red dress and corpse makeup, she had only one objective: prosecuting the accused who had broken the law. Unmindful of her own double irony. First that the moral question of whether ends justify the means applies only to the whistleblower and NOT to the federal government. Second, that she wanted the whistleblower taken into federal custody ASAP because al Qaeda would certainly want to capture him and torture his secrets from him. So, he’s doing this for fame and glory when you regard him as a beheading victim in waiting? Really?
Eric Bolling. I thought he would buy the Republican defense. He didn’t. Doesn’t. He’s right. He agreed with Beckel. It’s outrageous and utterly unacceptable. You know. A little thing called the Fourth Amendment that half or more of putative conservatives have cravenly forgotten about.
A few additional points.
It’s been at least a decade that critics of U.S. intelligence have been decrying the decline of human intelligence in favor of high-tech intelligence. The NSA programs we’ve been learning about are the ultimate proof. The FBI was unable to translate a human intelligence tip from the Russians about the Boston bombers. Interestingly, since the U.K. Became the most surveilled society on earth, that country’s crime solution rate has plummeted. Too much data and too little, uh, intelligence applied.
I once wrote a post about death. More than 6000 Americans die every day. Terrorism? Less than 2500 victims in the last dozen years. There are 300 million Americans. No, I won’t ask you to do the math. I know most of you can’t, and I AM talking about you, Gutfeld. Your fright is disgusting. Not even losing a city is worth abandoning the freedoms you have spent so much time proclaiming. 30,000 Americans die every year just bashing into each other in their cars. Maybe the government should monitor the new GPS apps in motor vehicles to find road rage and texting teens and slurring daddies. Screw the constitution if one life can be saved by hounding them to paralyzed paranoia.
Finally, I’m fascinated by the brand new Iron Curtain righties have discovered between the predatory Obama administration and the benign nexus of CIA/NSA/FBI and all the companies that funnel our private communications to them. I’m stupefied by the lack of imagination involved in assuming that “if you haven’t done anything wrong, you have nothing to fear.” Who decides what is wrong? Can’t envision people who think some phrase in a casual email is grounds to destroy your life? If somebody in the government decides you’re a threat or a pest. Ever heard of the recent media concept called the “narrative”?
Oh, just think. For once. Think of every google search you’ve ever done. If I wanted to cast you as a villain, what STORY could I concoct of who you are based on all those searches?
Just think.
Then come back at me sounding like Dana Perino, Greg Gutfeld, or even Kimberley Guilfoyle.
Actually, don’t. I don’t feel the need to respond to idiots anymore. They bore me so.
Another recurring theme in our conversations over the years is lack of a killer instinct on our side; the reluctance to drop the felling blow. I don’t get it. When someone does 52-card pick up on you, it’s always with your deck of cards, hence the gag. They’re being a douche, so why should you be nice to them?
The appropriate response would be to say, “You asshole.” and punch the guy that did it. But our side jovially starts picking up all 52 cards and complementing the sense of humor of the guy who flung them around, hoping he’ll remember what great sports we were when he was having his fun with us.
Either that or we do the gag with our own cards before realizing that we still have to pick them up. Like with this amnesty thing. Remember when Rubio was a Tea Party guy?
Also:
“If I wanted to cast you as a villain, what STORY could I concoct of who you are based on all those searches?”
For most of us, it’s probably a lot more simple than that. There probably wouldn’t even need to be a concocted story. Anyone seeking to hammer me with complete access to just my email would have me cold in a few minutes’ time. And the longer you’ve been using email, the worse it’d be. All of it makes me think about people like Patreus, Herman Cain, all the congressmen & senators who place mysterious votes seemingly on a whim, etc. Casts it all in a new light.
But, of course, we’ll never, ever see excerpts from Michelle & Barack’s email accounts, nor even his college transcripts. Why would we need to? They’re saints who care about us more than we deserve.
And the line some are using: “there are too many people for someone to comb through all the information.” It’s not about that. It’s about the wrong person having all that information ready to pull up at a moment’s notice when your name catches their attention. When you go into a library, you don’t start at the first book you come to and keep reading until you find what you were looking for. But this is even easier than grabbing a few books b/c it’s all digital and easily searchable.
We talked about this material on the phone (the drop-off was my phone’s fault, by the way, sorry about that) before I had the chance to read the post itself, and it’s better than I could even have guessed. The card analogy is illuminating, and I think you’re correct about the litmus test — and those failing it.
I first heard about the NSA scandal from Reddit, that hive of lefty scum. But they’re all internet nerds, so they were quick to throw O under the bus, laud Snowden as a hero whistleblower as he should be, and start thinking about what can be done. This is the mass of people who triggered the overthrow of SOPA / PIPA in Congress, so it actually gave me a minor ray of hope. 52 Pick Up indeed.
PS, is it me, or does Snowden look eerily like Jay Carney? The defenders become the attackers and vice versa… what is happening to this country?
http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3ut79l/
Who stands up for Snowden as a hero? The New Yorker. Watch those cards fall all over the place…
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2013/06/why-edward-snowden-is-a-hero.html