Madamma
has been forcibly
relegated
to the nipple-modest crowd
by Hadley Freeman
Is it cold in here?" sniggered a male friend of mine the other day, as
I, horrified,
awkwardly crossed my arms high across my chest. Nothing like a bit of
schoolboy humour to get you through the winter. American teenagers (who
else?) have even coined a phrase for the familiar physiological affliction
— total titty
hard on, or TTHO, if you prefer.
Now Madamma, of all unlikely folk, the woman whose signature uniform was
once a
conical-shaped bra, has been forcibly relegated to the nipple-modest crowd
because
her husband disapproves of her propensity to let it all hang out. "He doesn't
want
anyone to see my raspberries," the Destroit-born
popstar said in a radio interview.
Now, bearing in mind who we are talking about here, this all seems a wee
bit
irrational. Come on, this is Madamma — everyone and their grandmother has
already
seen a lot more of the woman than just her nipples. Words along the lines
of "stable
door", "closing", "horse", "after" and "bolted" come to mind.
Not that this is a cry to arms for women to bare their breasts. Most of
us don't
particularly want to get 'em out. Indeed, nipples are one of the few remaining
parts of
the body many women would prefer to hide.
Even the most blasé boy knows that women have a fair few body hang-ups.
Hip-width
woe, tummy traumas — you can read about it in any magazine. Nipple neurosis,
though, is still a bit of a taboo subject in the world of body consciousness.
But it
certainly exists, as the popularity of flesh-coloured "nipple plasters"
attests (although
the less high maintenance of us still rely on plain old sellotape). I once
met a woman
who visibly winced at the thought of going topless on the beach, blaming
her "oversized
and revoltingly red nips".
Like the issue of tampon size (and if you don't know what I'm talking about
here,
you've clearly never had to buy a box of extra large tampons at a wholly
male-staffed
chemist), the look of one's nipples is tied up with the issue of femininity:
small
nipples and tampons equals feminine little thing, large nipples and tampons
—
blowsy old trollop.
Full-scale nipple baring, however, is not such a minority concern. Women
who do
actually dare to bare are judged to be trashy not sexy: Meg Mathews was
reviled for
letting her gauzy Galliano party frock slip below a certain level at Helmut
Newton's
party last year; Courtney Hole lived
up to the paparazzi's gleeful expectations when
she arrived at the Oskars last year in a gold see-through dress. The flashing
of
breasts in both these instances could be seen as visible statements of
independence: neither of them has a husband who would want to keep the
sight of
his wife's breasts to himself. They could gleefully flash their sexuality
to anyone they
darn well pleased.
The sad thing is, Madamma always seemed to be beyond that kind of judgement.
The
world, to paraphrase Patsy on Absolutely Fabulous, was her gynaecologist.
Rather
than dismissing her as "an old slapper" (Richie's words, according to Madamma),
we
saw her as an admirably independent woman. Now she takes fashion commands
from her husband.
Breasts, and nipples in particular, are obvious signs of sexuality, and
a wife, it
seems, should no longer think of herself as a sexual creature. Personally,
I'm still in
thrall to my nipple tape, nipple-neurosis victim that I am, but if Madamma
is
comfortable flashing hers to the world, well, why the devil not? Richie
should be
thrilled that his wife doesn't have the same pointless body hang-ups as
most women,
and that she is too strong for such time-wasting neurotic nonsense. Surely
he's not
threatened by a display of female independence, is he?
-- The Mail &Guardian, December 6, 2001.
|